Chapter 6 of Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology by Collins and Halverson (2009) offers a compelling—and at times unsettling—vision of the future of education. The authors argue that traditional schooling is at risk of becoming obsolete if it fails to adapt to the evolving landscape of technology-enabled, informal learning. What stood out to me most was the idea that institutional learning must evolve to accommodate the individualized, interest-driven, and networked learning that increasingly defines students’ educational lives outside of school.

This chapter resonated with me deeply as both a PhD student in music education and as a church music director. In my own work with volunteer ensembles and intergenerational choirs, I’ve witnessed firsthand how people are now learning music in fragmented but self-directed ways – through YouTube tutorials, rehearsal tracks on their phones, TikTok voice trends, or apps like Noteflight and BandLab. Many of my former students and singers, especially the younger ones, engage with music fluently outside the traditional rehearsal space, often bringing creative interpretations or digital arrangements to the table. Rather than resisting this, I’ve begun to embrace it – inviting them to share those tools with the group and allowing tech to serve as a bridge rather than a barrier.

At the same time, I’m aware of the digital divide that still exists, particularly among older congregants or volunteers who lack confidence using these tools. Collins and Halverson briefly acknowledge these access issues, but I believe this is where their vision of the future needs more nuance. Equity and accessibility must remain central if we are to meaningfully integrate technology into all educational environments, especially in community-based or faith-based contexts like mine.

Ultimately, this chapter serves as a call to action: educators must view technology not as a threat, but as a partner in reimagining what meaningful, inclusive, and flexible education can look like. In my professional life, I’ve found that when I shift from being the gatekeeper of musical knowledge to a facilitator of shared discovery – one who welcomes both the old hymnal and the smartphone – my community thrives.

2 responses to “Response to Collins & Halverson, Chapter 6: “What Does the Future Hold?””

  1. John Francis Burke-Mcgoldrick Avatar

    I love your point about treating tech as a bridge and not a barrier. If we follow the flow of technology in our classrooms, it could make relating, connecting, and communicating with students much easier. The younger generations are so fluent in TikTok and other aspects of the internet that if we do not follow some of it, we could maybe lose respect of our students.

    Like

  2. Nicholas Franck Avatar

    Hi Sam! I thought you raised a bunch of great points in your response to Chapter 6 and I felt that your arrived at an important conclusion- that being the shift we educators must make to be more open and inclusive of new technologies changing previous means of learning. I do think that this idea is something that we (speaking in general, of course) definitely have to acknowledge and address if we are to teach modern students; we must of course, use modern methods as well. Similar to the implementation of Universal Design, I do think that technology is moving in a direction of increased accessibility (for the older generation as well). While there may be a steep initial learning curve, as technology is developed, the difficulty is often programmed out of the picture (thinking about ideas like the elderly and their use of FaceTime and Email). Fully acknowledging that some do better than others, but the once complicated systems have since become a bit more simple to use. I think (and hope) this is a trend that will continue and apply itself to ed. technology. 

    I loved the language you used in making your final statement. It is certainly not easy to embrace change, and I loved the idea of moving in the direction of “facilitator of shared discovery”. It outlines what education has the potential to be: a community of learners (teacher included) that can all participate in the sharing of ideas, thoughts, and methods, for the benefit of the whole group.

    Like

Leave a comment

Quote of the week

"People ask me what I do in the winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring."

~ Rogers Hornsby